Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com wrote:
--- a/dlls/user32/controls.h +++ b/dlls/user32/controls.h @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ typedef struct tagDIALOGINFO } DIALOGINFO;
#define DF_END 0x0001 -#define DF_OWNERENABLED 0x0002
As I already mentioned during our conversation in wine-devel my (not yet submitted) tests show that completely removing DF_OWNERENABLED handling is wrong.
And once again I'd like to see the tests submitted first with todo_wine statements in appropriate places, and the patches sent only after that with separate fixes for every failure found by the tests. Sending a bunch of tests as the final patch doesn't show what didn't actually work before, and what exactly has been fixed by the patch series.