Re: Coverity reports for test suite

[Henri Verbeet]

On 26 February 2017 at 19:09, Nikolay Sivov  wrote:
> Yes, we discussed this on irc at some point, by we I mean Amine and
> myself, and that's probably what he meant. I don't think it makes sense
> to scan tests yet, I'd expect noise rate to be overwhelming, resulting
> in thousands on reports of little to no value, like missing return value
> checks. We still have hundreds of potentially valuable ones for
> implementation part, that not a lot of people are looking at.

I'm sure I knew at some point 10 years ago, but how does one get
Coverity access these days?