Re: seh_try_macros2-00

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Gregory M. Turner"  writes:
> I guess the first question to ask, before all of the above is: which is a 
> worse sacrifice for wine?  Requiring compiler support for this, or an extra 
> parsing phase?  Or just having a broken dummy implementation like we do now?

For Winelib apps, the solution is to add support to the compiler. For
IDL-generated code, the solution is to make our IDL compiler generate
code that uses the existing __TRY macros (or even generates the C code
directly without using the macros if this allows more optimizations).