Re: [PATCH] user32: Allow WM_CAPTURECHANGE indicating SetCapture() parameter.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Christopher Thielen  wrote:
> Hm. If I don't specify '|lparam', won't it avoid checking the lParam 
> entirely?
>
> It's not that I'm working around the lParam check, it's that I 
> specifically _want_ the lParam check to ensure its value equals hWnd. 
> That's the behavior for which I'm hoping to prevent a regression. 
> Without the patch, Wine sets the lParam to the wrong value.
>
> So, should I keep it how it is then minus the comment syntax? Or perhaps 
> move the sequence into being simple variable within the function as 
> setting a value in a potentially shared struct is a bit awkward?

Isn't the original problem that you are trying to solve about Wine not
sending WM_CAPTURECHANGED message at all?