On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Evil Jay wine@eternaldusk.com wrote:
I can see where this would be useful for building on some platforms, but doesn't "sudo apt-get build-dep wine" work fine (for the most part) for Ubuntu?
I don't trust that.
The last time I compiled on a fresh *buntu, I recall using build-dep and then having to install one nvidia-specific '-dev' package to get DirectX support working. I think it was nvidia-glx-177-dev; Until it added some headers or whatnot, ./configure insisted it was going to build without DirectX.
See? In general, I would like install-build-deps.sh to be independent of the people who package wine. Think of it as perhaps the upstream of build-dep.
As far as specific tweaks: on Intrepid Ibex I don't believe x-dev or qt3-dev-tools are required. X-dev's a transitional package only dependent on x11proto-core-dev, which is already in your list. I don't have qt3-dev-tools installed (and everything compiles/runs clean).
Hmm, I'm not really sure how the qt stuff snuck in there. I guess libqt3-mt-dev was in the build deps when I started. I'll try removing all the qt stuff and see what happens. - Dan