Re: Problems with VirtualAlloc/Lock

[MIchael Ost]

On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 13:16, Raphael wrote:
> seems we have a bug report about that problem (behavior differences)
>  http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=890

I guess I am adding VirtualLock and VirtualAlloc to the list of APIs
that don't work the same in Wine vs Windows. Bug #890 is about
VirtualQuery and seems to have been patched/fixed...?

The diff is that  the issues I raise aren't bugs, but behaviors that
just haven't been implemented like actually locking virtual memory, and
using the win32 working sets.

That bug dates back to 2002! Oh, no. I guess this must be a low priority
issue for Wine. Bad news for me. ... mo

PS: thanks for the hint about the bug db, tho. I didn't think to check
there! Ooops... %)