Hi Alexandre,
2008/4/2, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
Right, forgot about that one. But I am still sure he would accept a "perfect" full featured and beautiful written pulseaudio driver. What he doesn't wants at all is wasting precious Wine developer time on creating one in his Wine git repository. And having it rot there because in 1-2 years all of todays pulseaudio proponents will complain how broken pulseaudio is and how much better this "yet another audio system 2.0" is and why Wine _needs_ to implement that one.
What I really want is for all the people who are clamoring for yet another driver to pitch in and start fixing the alsa driver instead.
Once this is done and we have demonstrated that we can actually make one driver work 100% correctly, then we can consider adding another one.
Apart from the horrible waveout playback code that was directly copied from wineoss, and to a lighter degree the wavein code is there anything seriously broken in winealsa? Nothing comes to mind at the moment.
Cheers, Maarten.