The live server doesn't have GD, can you do something about it Paul (imagemagick or GD 1.x) ?
If yes, can you resend when fixed:
1)My thumbs.php script Objet: Re: [AppDB] new screenshot and image classes Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:39:03 +0100
2) The patch Objet: [AppDB] fixed: new screenshot and image classes Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:36:15 +0100
I'd gladly do it myself but I think you are much more experienced than me regarding image manipulation.
FYI Here is the IRC log:
(23:15:49) laxdragon: jernst: no joy, in order to support GD 2.0, I will need to rebuild php. I'm not willing to do that at the moment. (23:16:17) laxdragon: damn red hat 9 is soooo out of date. (23:33:02) jernst: laxdragon: to rebuild php I just do emerge php ;-). (23:33:18) jernst: laxdragon: so what's the solution now ? do we use crappy resizing functions ? (23:33:25) jernst: laxdragon: do you have imagemagick instead ? (23:34:10) laxdragon: jernst: if this were debian it wouldn't have been a problem ayway. We set this up with Red Hat back when we though using a red hat support contract was a good idea. (23:34:29) laxdragon: jernst: yes, that is installed. (23:35:04) jernst: laxdragon: when you say you don't want to make that at the moment, it means you won't do it anytime soon ? Or you mean you'll do it later this month ? (23:35:51) laxdragon: jernst: I have plans to swith the server over to debian, but until then, I'm not doing any major changes on that box. (23:36:07) jernst: laxdragon: ok I'll ask Polleke if he can rewrite his image functions using either GD 1 or imagemagick (23:36:12) laxdragon: this is why I want WineHQ on its own box, I don't have time to do this right now. (23:36:43) laxdragon: if it didn't effect the codeweavers site, I wouldn't care.