Re: RtlpWaitForCriticalSection?

[Dan Kegel]

Christian Costa wrote:
> > > > > In that case our InitializeCriticalSection macro would have one 
> > > > > more parameter (the name) than the real function.
> > > >
> > > > Nope.  It wouldn't.  We would construct the name from __FILE__ and 
> > > > __LINE__.
> >
> > It would have the filename and line number as the name... that
> > would be enough to let you distinguish between locks. ...
> > The chief advantage, though, is that it gets us automatically
> > generated names with no source changes, at least for static calls...
>
> In this case, CRITICAL_SECTION_INIT should be update, at least to have 
> the line number. :-)
>
> So, if everyone agree. That 's fine for me. :-)
> Would you submit a patch that handle that ?

I will give it a try.  Then people can pass judgement on whether it's a good idea.
- Dan