On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:28:27PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Andrew Eikum aeikum@codeweavers.com wrote:
- TRACE("(%s, %s, %s, %s, %s): stub\n", debugstr_w(file), debugstr_variant(&v_args),
debugstr_variant(&v_dir), debugstr_variant(&v_op), debugstr_variant(&v_show));
Probably ": stub" part should be removed.
Yeah, it should.
- if (V_VT(&v_op) == VT_BSTR)
op = V_BSTR(&v_op);
- if (V_VT(&v_args) == VT_BSTR)
args = V_BSTR(&v_args);
- if (V_VT(&v_dir) == VT_BSTR)
dir = V_BSTR(&v_dir);
- if (V_VT(&v_show) == VT_INT)
show = V_INT(&v_show);
- ShellExecuteW(NULL, op, file, args, dir, show);
- return S_OK;
Shouldn't return value somehow reflect what ShellExecute returns? Also as usually it would be nice to see some tests for this, especially with not handled variant types.
I wanted to avoid re-testing all of ShellExecute itself and verifying the errors, but it's a good idea to test bad variants. I'll see what I can do.
Thanks, Andrew