Hi Sylvain,
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-1] Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
What settings are you using for wine? I don't see this problem with WRT, but I've only recently got it back up and running again.
What are the settings you want to know ?
~/.wine/config would be good.
On a seperate note, some other strange things I've noticed:
One of Monday night's patches seems to have broken a conformance test in listbox.c (line 123) but only for wine in win3.1-mode! Win3.1-mode also passes two todo tests (lines 129 and 134 both in the user/listbox.c).
Got same results here. Every emulated OS passes except win31.
Good! I'm glad its not just me ...
Also, does anyone else get orphaned zombie processes after running the regression tests? (which is moderately impressive: I thought init was supposed to clean these up)
I get some zombies too, and the kernel notices it. This is what I have in /var/log/messages: Oct 30 10:44:18 wine kernel: application bug: wine(2120) has SIGCHLD set to SIG_IGN but calls wait(). Oct 30 10:44:18 wine kernel: (see the NOTES section of 'man 2 wait'). Workaround activated.
That's interesting. My syslog doesn't have any message like that. What kernel are you running? I'm using 2.6.0-test8 on quisquiliae.
Talking about the kernel process test, it seems they are runned more than once, is it the normal way ? ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -p kernel32_test.exe.so process.c && touch process.ok tests/process.c: 1 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
[12 idential lines follow]
Yep, I get that (except I get 14 lines in total) when I take the -q option out.
Cheers,
Paul.
---- Paul Millar