5 Jul
2022
5 Jul
'22
1:49 p.m.
On Tue Jul 5 13:47:44 2022 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
Oh yuck, that's fragile. Right, so probably near the start of `pulse_probe_settings()` you want
if (!pulse_name[0]) pulse_name = NULL;
This does not appear to cause issues in practice, but I won't take a chance and I will apply that change.