Re: [4/7] comctl32/updown: Show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control

[Paul Vriens]

On 09/20/2009 10:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > From 8981901ce08501229487a1fcd2d430490cb66823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
> From: Nikolay Sivov
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:52:39 +0400
> Subject: Tests to show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control
>
> dlls/comctl32/tests/updown.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Hi Nikolay,

This one (and also "[5/7] comctl32/updown: Fix control behaviour for 
UDS_SETBUDDYINT style") add some tests that use UDM_GETPOS32 and/or 
UDM_SETPOS32.

These are only available as of 5.80.

We are already skipping tests in updown because of this, but not these 
new ones yet. Any idea about the cleanest approach?