Hi Huw,
thanks for the review.
Huw Davies huw@codeweavers.com wrote:
--- a/dlls/gdi32/font.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/font.c @@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ static DWORD CDECL font_GetGlyphIndices( PHYSDEV dev, const WCHAR *str, INT coun if (str[i] >= 0xf020 && str[i] <= 0xf100) glyph = str[i] - 0xf000; else if (str[i] < 0x100) glyph = str[i]; }
else if (WideCharToMultiByte( physdev->font->codepage, 0, &str[i], 1,
else if (WideCharToMultiByte( physdev->font->codepage, WC_NO_BEST_FIT_CHARS, &str[i], 1, &ch, 1, NULL, &used ) && !used) glyph = (unsigned char)ch; }
Hi Dmitry,
I suspect this should wait until after 6.0.
I'm OK with deferring 2/4 and 3/4, however I hope that 1/4 (tests) and 4/4 (MS Sans Serif default glyph index) could be accepted, 4/4 doesn't depend on previous patches in the series.
What app does this fix?
The application that the patches fix is not publicly available.