Re: [PATCH 3/3] kernel32/tests: Test for 'all processors' now valid (try 2).

[Henri Verbeet]

On 19 February 2010 15:30, Erich Hoover  wrote:
> What is the appropriate log notation for this? Is it
> "ntdll,kernel32/tests" ?  Thanks.

You'd just use the subject from patch 2, "ntdll: ...". However, I
think a more logical way to do this would be to first send a patch for
ntdll + tests, and send a test for kernel32 afterwards to prove it's
consistent with ntdll. Sending the test before the series is (IMO)
something you do when it's not entirely obvious that the test would
fail without the change introduced by the patch.