Re: [PATCH 1/2] server: Add default security descriptor ownership for processes.

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Erich E. Hoover"  writes:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > Vijay Kiran Kamuju  writes:
> > > +static struct security_descriptor *process_get_sd( struct object *obj )
> > > +{
> > > - static struct security_descriptor *key_default_sd;
> > > -
> > > - if (obj->sd) return obj->sd;
> > > -
> > > - if (!key_default_sd)
> > > - {
> > > -
> > >    size_t users_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_domain_users_sid );
> > > -
> > >    size_t admins_sid_len = security_sid_len( security_builtin_admins_sid );
> > > -
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd = mem_alloc( sizeof(*key_default_sd) + admins_sid_len + users_sid_len  );
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd->control   = SE_DACL_PRESENT;
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd->owner_len = admins_sid_len;
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd->group_len = users_sid_len;
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd->sacl_len  = 0;
> > > -
> > >    key_default_sd->dacl_len  = 0;
> > > -
> > >    memcpy( key_default_sd + 1, security_builtin_admins_sid, admins_sid_len );
> > > -
> > >    memcpy( (char *)(key_default_sd + 1) + admins_sid_len, security_domain_users_sid, users_sid_len );
> > > - }
> > > - return key_default_sd;
> >
> > key_default_sd is clearly not the appropriate name here.
>
> Sorry about that, I clearly started with the registry example
> (key_get_sd).  Would you prefer process_default_sd or just default_sd?

Either is fine.