Re: URLMON: Removed not used code.

[Troy Rollo]

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:45, Jacek Caban wrote:
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> -
> - Copyright 1999 Ulrich Czekalla for Corel Corporation
> - Copyright 2002 Huw D M Davies for CodeWeavers
> -
> - Copyright 2005 Jacek Caban for CodeWeavers
> -
> - This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> - modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public

Merely removing unused code does not give you any copyright in the file. On 
related matters, neither does fixing trivial bugs - there must be some 
substantial additional expression introduced to a file in order to give rise 
to a copyright claim. "Substantial" in this case means having expressive 
substance rather than referring to the size of the change.

Most of the code you have removed has been intentionally left in because the 
implementation is still incomplete, but the routines you have removed are 
there for whoever eventually completes the implementation to build on.

I am also not sure why you think the INTERNET_SCHEME_FILE case is unused.