Mike Hearn wrote:
Yeah, it's a bit of a pain keeping track of useful patches that were never merged. Maybe we need a list somewhere.
Yes, it can be very helpful, if I can be helpful in any way, I'm here :)
A few things that jump out at me (not really reviewed the code itself):
Thanks a lot, I'll review the patch tonight and I'll resubmit it after I cleaned it up :)
I have only a doubt:
- Is it possible to implement the ANSI version by converting to unicode then calling the wide version, rather than duplicate it?
How can I convert an ansi string to a unicode one and reverse? So I can redo the patch with the calls :)
Thanks,