Re: [RFC] jscript: Fix shift/reduce conflict by removing redundant FunctionDeclaration rule.

[Jacek Caban]

Rob Shearman wrote:
> I've looked at the spec and I see that it has a nice "lookahead not a
> member of '{, function'" in the rule for ExpressionStatement, meaning
> that the grammar cannot be implemented unambiguously by a LALR(1)
> parser-generator like bison. :-(

I've found on MS blog that my guess that JScript treads function 
expressions with identifier as function declaration was right. I can't 
find the link now, it was somewhere on
http://blogs.msdn.com/jscript/
I've sent a patch that implements this behavior.

Thanks,
    Jacek