Yeah i thought about that but fonts and such may change causing a test to generate a false failure. Discussing with with Alexandre it appeared to me that just an eyeball check would be best.
All the delays and such are all behind winetest_debug checks so when run in an programmatic way they will not be triggered allowing the test to run without supervision.
-aric
Kuba Ober wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007, Aric Stewart wrote:
I do a scanf() inside of DRAW_CHECK so that you can look at the scroll results and hit enter in the console to go on.
If that is not good I can change or even remove the DRAW_CHECK but when i was comparing the results it was handy to be able to have the test pause.
Do the check programmatically - grab the bitmaps and do proper bit-by-bit comparisons.
The tests are meant to be automatic and run without supervision.
Cheers, Kuba