Paul Vriens wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine@gmail.com writes:
a patch somewhat like this?
Yes; it may be better to do that in extract_test() since we get the test name there, it avoids hardcoding _test.exe at two different places. But the general principle is fine.
It doesn't make the code simpler though. When changing extract_test I also have to make sure that the tests are not run (--list) in get_subtests. I still have to get rid of the "_test.exe" in extract_test. I have to fiddle with test->exename and test->name etc...
Couldn't I just add a 'static const char testexec[] = "_test.exe" at the top?
Cheers,
Paul.
Hi again,
I have got it somewhat working (needs more testing). The attached screenshot shows the output from a win98 system (I only had d3d8 as missing in the report file for testing purposes). When you hover over the test, you will see the text as shown in the screenshot.
Cheers,
Paul.
