Re: crypt32: implement CryptSIPLoad (try 5)

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Paul Vriens"  writes:
> This patch still uses the non-native behavior. Is there a consensus on
> this? I guess we are the only ones talking about this but I hope there
> are more opinions.
>
> I said before that I also don't know why native does it like that and
> I don't see any benefit (yet). If this patch does get accepted we
> should have a proper comment in the source (or are the comments in the
> tests enough?).

I think it's worth figuring out why native does it like this.

Also the dll loading part of the patch is quite confusing, hopefully
doing it closer to the native way would help make it clearer.