Re: wineserver: Added support for read/only Registry, similar to unprivileged users (try 2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Chitescu  writes:
> In the filesystem we use as backend for Registry all we can tell is if we can 
> write to it or not so in the end one bit is all that's relevant (except if 
> it's completely unreadable when wine should abort).
>
> No matter what an user does it cannot change that. We don't want a wine 
> service running as root trying to replicate Windows access rights on the 
> native system, do we?

Yes, the right approach to multiuser is to have wineserver and system
processes run as root, and normal processes run as different users.