Re: wine/dlls/ntdll virtual.c

[Alexandre Julliard]

Mike Hearn  writes:
> According to the exec-shield paper, its effects can include revealing
> "bugs in applications that assume PROT_READ implies PROT_EXEC" due to the
> funky things it does with relocations into the ASCII-armour. Not sure but
> it might be worth ensuring mprotect is called afterwards....

mprotect is always called, and anyway the area is allocated with
PROT_EXEC already so it shouldn't make any difference.