Hi Alexandre,
On Sunday 13 November 2005 20:31, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
If you want to measure the quality of the implementation a much better way IMO is to measure regression test coverage. This may also motivate people to write more tests, which would do a lot more good than spending time adding magic comments all over the source.
That's a great idea (though it's measuring a different kind of quality than the one I was thinking of). If I understand correctly, this would mean building all of wine with 'make CFLAGS="-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"' (as documented by Aaron Arvey), running wine-test and then have some script recurse into the dll directories and analyse and build summary information out of the '*.c.gcov' files?
Bye,