On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
as I can't see why buffer should be dynamic at all. Please check it in case I made another mistake:
Ok then. In this case "my" part of the patch can be omitted: ..as "buffer" doesn't need to be preserved anymore. =)
Sorry for that nonsense. Maybe I got overheated today.