Re: Suggestions for improvement of the emulator

[Ivan Leo Puoti]

Juan Lang wrote:
> What this misses is the most common status that causes us all to argue:
> uncomitted, because Alexandre's not sure about it.  Perhaps he has a gut
> feeling that the approach is not right, but hasn't taken the time to
> identify any particular flaw.  Perhaps it merits additional thought. 
> Perhaps it's too big to review quickly.  Perhaps he hopes the submitter
> will realize it's not up to snuff, and resubmit a better patch.

So what? just set "Rejected, reason: tests needed" or "will review later" or whatever.

Ivan.