On 17/03/2008, Stefan Dösinger stefan@codeweavers.com wrote:
Am Montag, 17. März 2008 10:01:30 schrieb H. Verbeet:
Personally, I'm not quite convinced of the need of an ati fragment shader ffp replacement in the first place. The functionality seems more of the level of register combiners and texture shaders.
Using that argument we could remove the nvrc/nvts code as well. Obviously this doesn't get us more functionality, but it brings ATI cards, most importantly the r200 cards to the same level as Nvidia cards.
Supporting ATI fragment shader is useful, obviously. What I'm not so sure about is positioning it as an ffp replacement.