Re: [PATCH v2] loader: check return values of wld_mprotect and wld_mmap calls

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Gofman  writes:
> Do you think it is better to move return value check directly into
>
> wld_mmap and wld_mprotect instead of checking their status on call? I
> thought that checking return status rather than building in such an
> effect into system function wrapper is a common approach. Or maybe I
> could add wrapper inline functions with error checking?

It would be better to fix the compiler, or disable the broken
optimization.