Thanks Maarten. Your tip solved the issue. I wonder in any case if this should make rethink wine strategy and instead of forwarding funcs to a MS-name dll, depending on the API wine dlls could b e created. e.g. msvcrt.dll, msvr71.dll, msvcr80.dll, msvcr90.dll, ... --> winecr
Other APIs could also be considered such as the long spoken d3dx: d3dx9_36.dll, d3dx9_37.dll, d3dx9_38.dll ...d3dx10_43.dll, d3dx10_44.dll ... --> wined3dx msvcp... --> winecp msxml2.dll, msxml3.dll, msxml4.dll ... --> winexml
Luis