-----Original Message----- From: Dimitrie O. Paun [mailto:dimi@cs.toronto.edu] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:35 AM To: Brett Glass Cc: wine-devel@winehq.com Subject: Re: Dr. Seuss, licensing, and WINE
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
--Brett Glass (Who hasn't happened to contribute to WINE
yet, but may do so if
it remains open source)
Could you have finished wiht a more dumb line? LGPL _is_ open source my friend, go read about it first.
I don't know about other people, but I'm so tired of these arguments where LGPL is 'fascist', 'proprietary', 'not open source', etc. Once again, we don't discuss what is important, but we keep arguing about mostly irrelevant things, just like last time... :(
Especially as the OP seems to be in favour of contributing to an "open source" set of code that is used for the basis of a "commercial closed source" product.
Bill