Re: DINPUT: Generic FF effect implementation (FF #4)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Daniel Remenak  writes:
> Could I get some feedback on why this has not been applied?  I've got
> several additional patches prepared already that depend on it and if
> something needs to be changed I'd like to know before I get even more
> that do.  It still applies cleanly to CVS.  If it's just not being
> applied because it's considered dead code I can submit the other
> patches that actually use it.

That would be good. The pseudo vtbl functions that are not used in a
vtbl don't look right to me, but I'm not sure what you are planning to
do with that.