Re: propsys: mention that the functions are stubs

[Hans Leidekker]

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:41 +0100, Peter Davies wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
> > fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
> > percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
>
> A FIXME doesn't neccesarily indicate a stub. It sometimes is like
> "Flag FOO unsupported", which is not the same as a stub. Maybe we
> could have STUB macro to be called in stub functions.

Sure, we would overestimate the number of stubs a little but I don't
think we need such accurate statistics, it's certainly not worth
the addition of a new macro.

You could even catch most of those false positives by ignoring fixmes
which are preceded by a trace.