Le sam 25/10/2003 à 16:55, Mike Hearn a écrit :
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:15:17 -0400, Sir Vincent Béron scribed thus:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I didn't know I had become noble :) Our PM better not learn about it, or he'll be upset.
I'm beginning to wonder if some type of pre-install check would be welcome here, as well as for detecting absence of NPTL on RH9...
For NPTL we should at least check to ensure the binary will work and abort out if not, rather than having wierd crashes later on. Could you adapt your patch to do that Vincent?
Good idea, that'd be 4-5 lines. One which aborts if NPTL is enabled, the other if it's disabled. The optimal solution would still be a single binary for all configurations, but I'll wait for Alexandre.
The redhat-release package begins to be interesting for the first issue...
Vincent