Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Calling it Explorer would imply that it's supposed to do everything Windows explorer does, which seems a bit dubious to me. It'd be like calling the wineserver the winekernel.
No, I don't see why it implies that it has to do everything the Windows one does, but it has to do everything that some apps depend on.
Though, if we would want to support shell extensions, I don't see how we could effectively do it without having it do everything the native explorer does....
Shachar