Thanks for the clarification about todo_wine, Paul
Paul Vriens wrote:
Well I don't think it will be accepted as is. We usually don't add functions that are not used anywhere especially when the comments say that there is a bug elsewhere that should be fixed first.
Well, I was thinking about dropping my workaround (which returns a valid path) and adding my (currently unused) helper function, which uses the buggy LookupAccoutSid.
This would be formally correct, but will result in returning an invalid path. Would this be acceptable?
Regards Andreas