Le dimanche 25 décembre 2005 à 21:47 +0100, wino@piments.com a écrit :
Does someone want to reign in this fuck-wit before she pisses of the whole community?
How can this be a dupe of a meta bug ?! The meta is supposed to regroup all such minor bugs. That's why it was created.
I don't want to be part of your argument or to question the validity of the resolution your bug has been given; but the first thing I'd do is create separate bugs for separate problems. You should also give a more descriptive title to your bugs.
Examples:
1) "wine should not call wineprefixcreate when called without PROGRAM argument" 2) "wine -? and wine -h should be equivalent to wine --help" 3) "wine --help should tell user to check man wine" 4) "wine --help should link to winehq" 5) "wine installation should create links to winecfg in the windows'manager menu" etc.
Then you could create a usability meta bug (but meta bugs tend to be not very useful) and link these bugs with it.
This way if some of the bugs/enhancement are refused by the developpers you don't loose the chance to see some of your proposed changes to be implemented.
This is the same rational behind the fact that big patches that change a million things are rejected: some of your points/change may be valid, but your bug report/patch is useless because it asks/does things that are not accepted by the developpment team.
Last thing in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4146#c1, I don't know why you said sol.exe is a special case and I don't see why we should not tell user that he can use a valid unix path to run applications with Wine.
Please try to overcome your little trouble with Vitaliy and keep up with your efforts into helping Wine being more usable.
Happy Christmas everyone.