On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, tom wrote: [...]
I am going to start the ToDo's as well. I need some feed back here about how best to do this .. Should I just look at the ToDo's to get to .9 and post them or up to 1.0 ?? Also if anyone is aware of a current ToDo that is not on the .9/1.0 pages can you please send them to me ?
If there is something missing please let me know too so that I can update the 0.9/1.x task lists: http://bugs.winehq.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&am... http://bugs.winehq.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&am...
About VxDs, why is the implementation status 5%? Are there more VxDs that we should implement? If not and the existing ones are doing their job, then maybe the implementation status should be higher: 90% or something.
Concerning 'How to use Winelib': I would change its status from 'Adequate' to outdated, and completion from 90% down to something like 50%. Though in the case of documentation I have trouble separating documentation from implementation. Similarly the 'Wine Porting Tool' documentation is getting outdated.
Nitpick: I would also rename the 'multimedia drivers' (OSS, Alsa, aRts, NAS, AudioIO) to 'sound drivers', or are they handling anything else?