Re: Thoughts on implementation of winhttp.dll

[Zac Brown]

Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 23:56:51 Rob Shearman wrote:
> > How about:
> > 3) Copy the networking sublayer from wininet into winhttp and build on top
> > of that to implement winhttp. Reimplement wininet on top of winhttp.
>
> Drawback to this option is that you're going to destabilize wininet, but
> perhaps this is feasible now that we have a stable branch.
>
> -Hans

I can see that it would be useful to do this so only one http set of functions 
need be updated as adjustments are made.

I'd say it would definitely be something to do well after winhttp is stabilized.

-Zac