Re: Alexandre Julliard : server: Added access rights mapping to synchronization objects.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman  writes:
> Why did you decide to rely on another function to map the access rights? 
> It seems that none of the objects' mappings depend on any state in the 
> object, so couldn't you have just put the access rights that 
> GENERIC_READ, GENERIC_WRITE, GENERIC_EXECUTE and GENERIC_ALL map to 
> somewhere associated with the object and have just one mapping function.

I think it's cleaner to use functions in the ops structure rather than
starting to mix various data pointers in there too.