Re: [v3 03/12] comctl32: Added basic implementation for task dialogs and add tests

[Fabian Maurer]

> We usually use winetest_interactive for that.

Is that necessary if I replace the test with another in the next patch 
anyways? I figured it would be enough if I don't introduce a test fail, in case 
of a bisect or something along the lines.
> Also, please try to send your changes in reasonable sized chunks (max 5-7)
> in the future. Sending more patches at once only makes sense if they do not
> depend on each other.

I don't quite understand what you mean. You mean I sent too many patches at 
once? But all those 12 patches depend on each other, together only they form 
an implementation that could replace the current one.

Regards,
Fabian Maurer