Re: add support for slists

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

And one more...

"Damjan Jovanovic"  wrote:
> +__int64 interlocked_cmpxchg64( __int64 **dest, __int64 *xchg, __int64 *compare )
> +{
> - _lwp_mutex_lock( &interlocked_mutex );
> - if (memcmp(*dest, compare, 8) == 0)
> -
>    memcpy(*dest, xchg, 8);
> - else
> -
>    memcpy(compare, *dest);
> - _lwp_mutex_unlock( &interlocked_mutex );
> - return compare;
>
> +}

Is there any particular reason that you use memcmp/memcpy instead of
directly manipulating 64-bit values?