23 Oct
2012
23 Oct
'12
6:57 a.m.
On 22 October 2012 23:19, Christian Costa titan.costa@gmail.com wrote:
Le 22/10/2012 22:55, Jacek Caban a écrit :
Christian, there were some informal attempts to limit usage of stuff like LPVOID (and really any LP* types). It would be nice if you could avoid it in your patches.
Jacek
I don't mind change it but just by curiosity what's the reason? MSDN uses it a lot.
The main consideration is that "const LPVOID" etc. doesn't do what you want it to do, though I'd also argue that in most cases typedefs in general only obscure the actual type of variables.