16 Jan
2003
16 Jan
'03
12:25 a.m.
"Mike Hearn" m.hearn@signal.qinetiq.com wrote:
Well, you know a lot more about this than me, so if you think the check shouldn't be added then that's fine.
I'm not opposed to your fix, not at all. I just would like to understand better what is the real problem with our code. If you, or somebody else, could confirm (by a test case) that exactly (MFT_BITMAP | MFT_SEPARATOR) combination should be rejected then I'll vote for your patch.
--
Dmitry.