Re: IStorage* vs. LPSTORAGE vs. winapi_check

[Francois Gouget]

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:
[...]
> The LPSTORAGE layout is definitely not the same.

What do you mean? I just replaced 'IStoreage *' with 'LPSTORAGE' and 
since the LPSTORAGE declaration is 'typedef IStorage *LPSTORAGE;' the 
layout should be the same. Now if the original prototype was wrong for 
some other reason that's another issue.
> So LPSTORAGE16 would be more fitting I think.

You mean in the documentation?
> Also when not using "SEGPTR" I get conversion warnings and it clarifies
> a bit what exactly the type of the argument is.

Do you mean it would be better not to use 'SEGPTR' in the prototypes?