On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss tehblunderbuss@gmail.com wrote:
marco wrote:
I looked into it. And there are some options.
I can make a separate package of gecko that I can make it a dependencie of wine. Problem is people have to know where to find it or the get stuck.
I can also make the package and make it not a dependencie on wine but the the people don't know it exist.
And I can just put it in the wine package.
I think this is the best option in this case. Its the easiest option because people only have to download en install one package.
marco
This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much, like Debian. Who wants to find out that you need so many wine* packages in order to get something to work?
Agreed, but I don't think wine, wine-dev, and wine-gecko is too much, especially considering that wine-gecko rarely changes...
- Austin