Re: manual patch tracking system for ntdll

[Bill Medland]

On April 15, 2003 09:14 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> [e-mail] writes:

snip
> > IMHO, if a patch is correct (can be verified by tests) it should be
> > applied, even if no application needs this functions (at the moment).
>
> There is a very big difference between "correct" and "verified by
> tests".

Hear, Hear!!!

snip