22 Mar
2012
22 Mar
'12
6:43 a.m.
On 3/22/2012 6:00 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Joey Yandledragon@dancingdragon.be wrote: It's been explained several times already that any approach to share data between wineserver and clients is going to be rejected.
I think this is the reason that timers in shared_user_data are not being updated. I also think that updating timers in every client process in every 15.6 ms is a lot of overhead.
Another approach could be no to allocate that address and provide up to date data in an signal/exception handler. This is a more complex approach and not sure whether possible in user mode. And of course would defeat the purpose using shared memory for high performance.
Thanks.
Kornel