Re: COM Enhancement patch

[John K. Hohm]

> Well, I was hoping some of the COM experts would comment on that. If
> I understand it right you are avoiding writing some thunking routines
> for older interfaces, at the cost of an extra pointer access in every
> function. I'm not convinced it's a good trade-off, but I'd like to
> hear other opinions.

I might not exactly be an expert, but I don't like the extra work being done
everywhere with the extra pointer.  If writing the thunk functions is really so
cumbersome, perhaps a macro for generating the thunk functions is in order.