16 Mar
2016
16 Mar
'16
3:44 a.m.
On 15.03.2016 15:20, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com writes:
On 7 March 2016 at 08:40, Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de wrote:
I assume this patch was missed somehow, resending.
No, the patch is just not very useful.
FWIW I asked Henri for clarification, and he said that the ddraw tests should be ported to ddraw[1247] so it's better to avoid changing them until that's completed.
Unless Henri already has prepared patches which would not apply anymore, that does not really explain to me why such a trivial typo fix is rejected. It's better to fix typos before the code is duplicated in multiple tests, isn't it?